View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0004195 | ardour | bugs | public | 2011-07-17 12:53 | 2011-10-25 00:18 |
| Reporter | oofus | Assigned To | cth103 | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | Dell D830 core2duo T9300 2.5GHz | OS | Kubuntu | OS Version | 10.10 |
| Target Version | 3.0-beta1 | ||||
| Summary | 0004195: A track that is record armed when a session is loaded doesn't switch the metering back when record is disarmed | ||||
| Description | A track that is record armed when a session is loaded doesn't switch the metering back when record is disarmed. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | Start a new session. Add a track. Set its meter point to 'Pre'. Enable the tracks rec arm button, The metering switches to 'In'. Release the rec arm the metering switches back to 'Pre'. Enable the rec arm again, save the session and quite Ardour. Start Ardour again and re-load the same session. The track is rec armed as it should be and the meter point is set to 'In', as it should be. Release the rec arm button on the track and the metering stays at 'In', it should switch back to 'Pre' The meter point for a rec armed track should be an override for the metering point selected by the user but shouldn't supplant it. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
this is interesting. what would it switch it back to, when there's no information on what it was? or is the point that we need to save and restore both metering states? |
|
|
I don't think that both metering states need to be saved or restored. The metering point is set by the user (pressing the metering button) and when in record the metering point is switched to 'In' regardless. So the logic needs to be : metering position = that set by the user unless in record then it is 'In'. The meter position and record state are already saved in the session. |
|
|
Fixed in SVN 10304. |
|
|
Excellent, thanks for fixing this. Seems to work absolutely fine. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-17 12:53 | oofus | New Issue | |
| 2011-07-17 12:53 | oofus | cost | => 0.00 |
| 2011-07-17 13:48 | cth103 | Priority | high => normal |
| 2011-07-17 13:48 | cth103 | Target Version | => 3.0-beta1 |
| 2011-07-18 18:17 | paul | Note Added: 0011159 | |
| 2011-07-18 18:29 | oofus | Note Added: 0011160 | |
| 2011-10-24 21:53 | cth103 | Status | new => confirmed |
| 2011-10-24 22:54 | cth103 | Note Added: 0011775 | |
| 2011-10-24 22:54 | cth103 | Status | confirmed => resolved |
| 2011-10-24 22:54 | cth103 | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2011-10-24 22:54 | cth103 | Assigned To | => cth103 |
| 2011-10-25 00:18 | oofus | Note Added: 0011780 | |
| 2011-10-25 00:18 | oofus | Status | resolved => closed |
